Hi Laurent,

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:09:26 -0000, Laurent Sansonetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
wrote:

>> There are just a couple of things I'd propose: maybe we should rename
>> XML::Reader.walker to XML::Reader.document, and also alias
>> XML::Reader.new
>> to XML::Reader.string. IMO it seems more consistent (all constructors
>> named for the argument they take).
>
> Good ideas.
>
> Maybe we could perhaps add XML::Document#reader that would do
> XML::Reader.walker(self).
>

Good thinking, that'd be a handy addition.

>>> The patch contains some test cases, but everything is not
>>> covered (yet). Also, there is no RDoc comments yet, I would like to
>>> be
>>> sure that you agree with the API before starting to document it :)
>>
>> I wonder, any chance you might join the project, commit this patch,
>> and
>> document it in CVS? That way, you'll be able to help maintain the
>> code too
>> ;)
>
> Sure, I would be honored. My rubyforge username is 'lrz'.
>

Cool. I've added you to the project, and you should have commit rights  
now, so please go ahead and merge your patch straight to HEAD. Welcome  
aboard!

Cheers,
Ross

-- 
Ross Bamford - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
libxml-devel mailing list
libxml-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel

Reply via email to