Hi Ross,

On Dec 2, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Ross Bamford wrote:

> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:09:26 -0000, Laurent Sansonetti  
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>> There are just a couple of things I'd propose: maybe we should  
>>> rename
>>> XML::Reader.walker to XML::Reader.document, and also alias
>>> XML::Reader.new
>>> to XML::Reader.string. IMO it seems more consistent (all  
>>> constructors
>>> named for the argument they take).
>>
>> Good ideas.
>>
>> Maybe we could perhaps add XML::Document#reader that would do
>> XML::Reader.walker(self).
>
> Good thinking, that'd be a handy addition.

I added all of them.

>>>> The patch contains some test cases, but everything is not
>>>> covered (yet). Also, there is no RDoc comments yet, I would like to
>>>> be
>>>> sure that you agree with the API before starting to document it :)
>>>
>>> I wonder, any chance you might join the project, commit this patch,
>>> and
>>> document it in CVS? That way, you'll be able to help maintain the
>>> code too
>>> ;)
>>
>> Sure, I would be honored. My rubyforge username is 'lrz'.
>>
>
> Cool. I've added you to the project, and you should have commit rights
> now, so please go ahead and merge your patch straight to HEAD. Welcome
> aboard!

Excellent! I had trouble checkouting the project in the past days (it  
looks like I got the same problem with another RubyForge project), but  
now it's working. I merged the patch along with the suggestions. I  
will add documentation soon.

I filed the CHANGELOG as well though it doesn't seem to be  
maintained :-) What's the purpose of this file? It is only for major  
changes?

Cheers,
Laurent
_______________________________________________
libxml-devel mailing list
libxml-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel

Reply via email to