On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 23:44:17 -0000, Laurent Sansonetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
wrote:

> Hi Ross,
>
> On Dec 2, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Ross Bamford wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:09:26 -0000, Laurent Sansonetti
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> There are just a couple of things I'd propose: maybe we should
>>>> rename
>>>> XML::Reader.walker to XML::Reader.document, and also alias
>>>> XML::Reader.new
>>>> to XML::Reader.string. IMO it seems more consistent (all
>>>> constructors
>>>> named for the argument they take).
>>>
>>> Good ideas.
>>>
>>> Maybe we could perhaps add XML::Document#reader that would do
>>> XML::Reader.walker(self).
>>
>> Good thinking, that'd be a handy addition.
>
> I added all of them.
>
>>>>> The patch contains some test cases, but everything is not
>>>>> covered (yet). Also, there is no RDoc comments yet, I would like to
>>>>> be
>>>>> sure that you agree with the API before starting to document it :)
>>>>
>>>> I wonder, any chance you might join the project, commit this patch,
>>>> and
>>>> document it in CVS? That way, you'll be able to help maintain the
>>>> code too
>>>> ;)
>>>
>>> Sure, I would be honored. My rubyforge username is 'lrz'.
>>>
>>
>> Cool. I've added you to the project, and you should have commit rights
>> now, so please go ahead and merge your patch straight to HEAD. Welcome
>> aboard!
>
> Excellent! I had trouble checkouting the project in the past days (it
> looks like I got the same problem with another RubyForge project), but
> now it's working. I merged the patch along with the suggestions. I
> will add documentation soon.
>

Excellent, it all looks good from this end. I can't tell you how great it  
is that this is now in :)

> I filed the CHANGELOG as well though it doesn't seem to be
> maintained :-) What's the purpose of this file? It is only for major
> changes?
>

It probably should be updated, but I tend to forget when I'm working on  
something in public version control (it's easy to grab a changelog from  
cvs or svn anyway). I guess it does make life easier for distribution  
package maintainers though, so I'll get around to updating it from the CVS  
logs in the next few days.

Cheers,
-- 
Ross Bamford - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
libxml-devel mailing list
libxml-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel

Reply via email to