On 9/4/07, Dan Janowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trans, > > The trunk had not been merged from MEM2 at all yet. It is still in > the 0.4pre state. If the MEM2 is deemed a better stable version then > I can merge back into the trunk. > > We should make a project coding decision about where development > happens. I prefer development in branches, the trunk always being the > last stable release.
I'm all for development in branches, but I think trunk should be the current "testing" version. We need a central place various branches merge back to. And minor changes such a inline docs, typos and so forth don't require full branches. The last stable release will be in tags/, which should never be modified, as well as a maintenance branch where minor fixes and back ports can be made as needs be. At least that's my take. Other opinions? T. _______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
