Moving to new thread...
No not lib/xml/, that's were we had been. we need the code under lib/ libxml/. the xml/ directory is there only for backward compatibility.
So is this what you are proposing? lib libxml.rb libxml attributes.rb attr.rb <plus other ruby files> Meaning libxml.rb would look like this: require 'libxml_ruby' require 'libxml/attributes' <etc>Wouldn't using the existing subdirectory xml be more natural, simple since all the subiles are in the XML namespace?
Or are you proposing: lib libxml libxml.rb xml attributes.rb attr.rb <plus other ruby files> In this case, then code that uses libxml would have to do this: require 'libxml/libxml' Versus what happens now: require 'libxml' Thanks, Charlie
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel