Moving to new thread...
No not lib/xml/, that's were we had been. we need the code under lib/ libxml/. the xml/ directory is there only for backward compatibility.
So is this what you are proposing?
lib
libxml.rb
libxml
attributes.rb
attr.rb
<plus other ruby files>
Meaning libxml.rb would look like this:
require 'libxml_ruby'
require 'libxml/attributes'
<etc>
Wouldn't using the existing subdirectory xml be more natural, simple
since all the subiles are in the XML namespace?
Or are you proposing:
lib
libxml
libxml.rb
xml
attributes.rb
attr.rb
<plus other ruby files>
In this case, then code that uses libxml would have to do this:
require 'libxml/libxml'
Versus what happens now:
require 'libxml'
Thanks,
Charlie
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
