Moving to new thread...

No not lib/xml/, that's were we had been. we need the code under lib/
libxml/. the xml/ directory is there only for backward compatibility.

So is this what you are proposing?

lib
  libxml.rb
  libxml
     attributes.rb
     attr.rb
     <plus other ruby files>


Meaning libxml.rb would look like this:

require 'libxml_ruby'
require 'libxml/attributes'
<etc>

Wouldn't using the existing subdirectory xml be more natural, simple since all the subiles are in the XML namespace?

Or are you proposing:

lib
  libxml
     libxml.rb
     xml
       attributes.rb
       attr.rb
       <plus other ruby files>

In this case, then code that uses libxml would have to do this:

require 'libxml/libxml'

Versus what happens now:

require 'libxml'

Thanks,

Charlie

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
libxml-devel mailing list
libxml-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel

Reply via email to