On Jul 14, 12:48 pm, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trans wrote: > > > On Jul 14, 12:34 pm, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> True as well. But I wouldn't say undoable. We can *responsibly* > >>> migrate. Or we can take a simpler solution and just wrap everything in > >>> LibXML module. Then in libxml.rb: > >>> include LibXML > >> Ok - I can agree with that. Done. > > >>> I leave it up to you all to decide what is best. All I ask is that the > >>> lib directory at least be called 'libxml'. > >> Done. > > >> With those changes, I'm going to cut a new 0.7.1 release unless there > >> are objections. > > > Cool. But give me a few hours to check it out, okay? > > No problem. Just updating the RDocs at the moment. The namespace > change is checked in.
Okay. I just did a little clean up. You'll notice I added an admin/ directory; this works well for separating administrative material. And I updated the Rakefile -- The gem's require_path needed ext/libxml added to it; and I made packages get stored in admin/pkg/ instead of pkg/. T. _______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
