On Jul 14, 3:28 pm, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Also, I incremented the version to 0.8.0, based on the thought that the > >> LibXML module change warranted more than a 0.7.1 release. > > > okay. but lets try to pace ourselves a bit or will be out out of > > numbers soon ;) > > No doubt! And we might event get to a 1.0.0 :) > > FWIW, I actually think we're close to a 1.0.0 quality release. The only > issue I know about is the segmentation fault that occurs if a document > is freed by the GC before any dependent XML::XPath::Object instances. > I've worked out in my head how to fix that, and the internal XPath > refactoring I checked in got the code to a point where its now solvable > (although in an ugly manner). > > Luckily, we have all of 0.8.x and 0.9.x to make sure we get it right.
:) Concerning the next release, let's here from Sean on on the namespace first; if it works for him then go for it. BTW, I asked about it on ruby-talk to see what general sense of it there might be. http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-talk-google/browse_thread/thread/184734f1a537d9f4?hl=en# T. _______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
