I'm finding the general license discussion here interesting, but I'm aware that by participating I'm taking part in the topic drift of what is supposed to be a clearly focused mailing list. It's been suggested that we rename the mailing list to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to try and emphasise that narrow focus: may I suggest that we start a new mailing list with that title and leave this list running for more general discussion of how open source licenses can work? Russ? -- __ \/ o\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hedonism.demon.co.uk/paul/ \ / /\__/ Paul Crowley Upgrade your legacy NT machines to Linux /~\
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Seth David Schoen
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Pat St. Jean
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Seth David Schoen
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Bruce Perens
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Pat St. Jean
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Tim Pierce
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Nick Moffitt
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Bruce Perens
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Signal 11
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Martin Konold
- Re: [email protected]? Paul Crowley
- Re: [email protected]? Ean R . Schuessler
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Pat St. Jean
- Re: GPL and LGPL question - legal John Muller
- Re: GPL and LGPL question - legal Pat St. Jean
- Re: GPL and LGPL question - legal Dan Jenkins
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Bruce Perens
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Bruce Perens
- Re: GPL and LGPL question phred
- FSF political activism J.H.M. Dassen

