19May1999 09:07AM (-0500) From [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] psj [Pat St. Jean]
> I'm sorry you feel that way. Check the Linux kernel archives. I
> sent in a bunch of patches last year (early on) to update and
> improve the x86 CPU detection. I gave up BECAUSE of the GPL. I
> can't make any money off of that code with programs that I DON'T
> want to release the source for. I was stupid, and shoudn't have
> done it.
You're more than welcome to re-license any of your original
code under any license you choose. Naturally, you won't be able to
re-license other peoples' code.
Of course, the discussion on whether or not you can make any
money off of GPLed code is outside the scope of this mailing list.
--
I noticed
it is getting about time to leave everywhere
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Bruce Perens
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Wilfredo Sanchez
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Bruce Perens
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Wilfredo Sanchez
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Seth David Schoen
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Pat St. Jean
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Seth David Schoen
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Bruce Perens
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Pat St. Jean
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Tim Pierce
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Nick Moffitt
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Bruce Perens
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Signal 11
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Martin Konold
- [email protected]? Paul Crowley
- Re: [email protected]? Ean R . Schuessler
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Pat St. Jean
- Re: GPL and LGPL question - legal John Muller
- Re: GPL and LGPL question - legal Pat St. Jean
- Re: GPL and LGPL question - legal Dan Jenkins
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Bruce Perens

