On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 09:07:47AM -0500, Pat St. Jean wrote: > > I'm sorry you feel that way. Check the Linux kernel archives. I sent in > a bunch of patches last year (early on) to update and improve the x86 CPU > detection. I gave up BECAUSE of the GPL. I can't make any money off of > that code with programs that I DON'T want to release the source for. I > was stupid, and shoudn't have done it. What are you talking about? If you're complaining that you can't take the Linux kernel and make it into a proprietary work, you're not likely to find many sympathetic ears. -- Regards, Tim Pierce RootsWeb Genealogical Data Cooperative system obfuscator and hack-of-all-trades
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Paul Crowley
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Bruce Perens
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Wilfredo Sanchez
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Bruce Perens
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Wilfredo Sanchez
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Seth David Schoen
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Pat St. Jean
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Seth David Schoen
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Bruce Perens
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Pat St. Jean
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Tim Pierce
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Nick Moffitt
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Bruce Perens
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Signal 11
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Martin Konold
- [email protected]? Paul Crowley
- Re: [email protected]? Ean R . Schuessler
- Re: GPL and LGPL question Pat St. Jean
- Re: GPL and LGPL question - legal John Muller
- Re: GPL and LGPL question - legal Pat St. Jean
- Re: GPL and LGPL question - legal Dan Jenkins

