Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Actually there is just a small difference between the set of licenses > that are defined as open source and the set that we define as free > software. There is only one known case where we disagree, and that is > the Apple license. APSL 1.0, APSL 1.1, or both? -- __ \/ o\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Got a Linux strategy? \ / /\__/ Paul Crowley http://www.hedonism.demon.co.uk/paul/ /~\
- Re: RFC soon on essay "Does Free Soft... Richard Stallman
- Re: RFC soon on essay "Does Free ... John Cowan
- Re: RFC soon on essay "Does ... Ean R . Schuessler
- Re: RFC soon on essay "D... Miguel de Icaza
- Re: RFC soon on essay "D... Csaba Szigetvari
- Re: RFC soon on essay "Does ... Richard Stallman
- Re: RFC soon on essay "D... Miguel de Icaza
- Re: RFC soon on essay "D... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: RFC soon on essay "D... Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: RFC soon on essay "D... Richard Stallman
- Re: RFC soon on essay "D... Paul Crowley
- Re: RFC soon on essay "D... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: RFC soon on essay "D... Miguel de Icaza
- Re: RFC soon on essay "D... Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: RFC soon on essay "Does Free Software... Miguel de Icaza
- Re: RFC soon on essay "Does Free Software Producti... Jacques Chester

