> Anyway, you don't have to go that far for an example, think of all the linux > distrib who also ship non free sofware with it ? True, but the only non-free software living at a low enough level to be considered part of the OS (that I can think of) is qt (which a lot of open source folk don't consider a threat to the movement). The rest is apps (many of that being programs that do a job that no free software does satisfactorily yet, and even accepted as a necessary evil by FSF.. unless RMS has any objections to this statement) Kris Coward
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Rick Moen
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Tom Hull
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Rick Moen
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Alejandro Forero Cuervo
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Arandir
- Re: GNU License for Hardware mark
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Justin Wells
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Richard Stallman
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Derek Balling
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardware Sven LUTHER
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardware Kristofer Coward
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardwa... Arandir
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardwa... Sven LUTHER
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardwa... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Ha... Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Ha... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Ha... Stephen Turnbull
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Ha... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Ha... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Ha... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Ha... Kristofer Coward

