On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 03:55:11PM -0400, Kristofer Coward wrote:
> > Anyway, you don't have to go that far for an example, think of all the linux
> > distrib who also ship non free sofware with it ?
>
> True, but the only non-free software living at a low enough level to be
> considered part of the OS (that I can think of) is qt (which a lot of open
That is a discution we best not have here, please.
> source folk don't consider a threat to the movement). The rest is apps
> (many of that being programs that do a job that no free software does
> satisfactorily yet, and even accepted as a necessary evil by FSF.. unless
> RMS has any objections to this statement)
You could consider a lot of d�emons and other stuff also in this category.
Friendly,
Sven LUTHER
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Rick Moen
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Alejandro Forero Cuervo
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Arandir
- Re: GNU License for Hardware mark
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Justin Wells
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Richard Stallman
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Derek Balling
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardware Sven LUTHER
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardw... Kristofer Coward
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for H... Arandir
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for H... Sven LUTHER
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for H... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License f... Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License f... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License f... Stephen Turnbull
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License f... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License f... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License f... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License f... Kristofer Coward
- Re: gEDA: Re: GNU License for Hardware Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardware Sven LUTHER

