> The rest is apps > (many of that being programs that do a job that no free software does > satisfactorily yet, and even accepted as a necessary evil by FSF. > > The truth is more complex than that. We don't accept non-free > apps as a necessary evil, but we do accept that many GNU users > want to run them. I suppose I should have been clearer with the implicit "until a free alternative can be written" in my statement of non-free applications as a necessary evil.
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for H... Kristofer Coward
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License f... Arandir
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License f... Sven LUTHER
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License f... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU Lice... Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU Lice... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU Lice... Stephen Turnbull
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU Lice... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU Lice... Richard Stallman
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU Lice... Richard Stallman
- Re: gEDA: Re: GNU License f... Kristofer Coward
- Re: gEDA: Re: GNU License for Hardware Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardware Sven LUTHER
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardw... Richard Stallman
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Arandir
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Richard Stallman
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Robert J Hale
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Tom Hull
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins
- Re: GNU License for Hardware L. Peter Deutsch
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Richard Stallman

