Matthew C. Weigel scripsit:
> My opinion is that "MIT License with specified jurisdiction" should be
> approved, as this seems like a valid concern.
It should be noted for the record that such licenses are not GPL-compatible.
--
John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
--Douglas Hofstadter
- X.Net, Inc. License Russell Nelson
- Re: X.Net, Inc. License Brian DeSpain
- Re: X.Net, Inc. License Karsten M. Self
- Re: X.Net, Inc. License Russell Nelson
- Re: X.Net, Inc. License Karsten M. Self
- Re: X.Net, Inc. License Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: X.Net, Inc. License M. Drew Streib
- Re: X.Net, Inc. License Russell Nelson
- Re: X.Net, Inc. License John Cowan
- Re: X.Net, Inc. License Forrest J Cavalier III
- Re: X.Net, Inc. License M. Drew Streib
- Re: X.Net, Inc. License Karsten M. Self
- Re: X.Net, Inc. License Russell Nelson
- Re: X.Net, Inc. License Brian Behlendorf

