Karsten M. Self writes:
> on Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 01:19:20PM -0400, John Cowan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Matthew C. Weigel scripsit:
> >
> > > My opinion is that "MIT License with specified jurisdiction" should be
> > > approved, as this seems like a valid concern.
> >
> > It should be noted for the record that such licenses are not GPL-compatible.
>
> Why? Because of the "no additional conditions" requirement?
That's the theory. Given that there's always going to *be* a venue,
it doesn't seem like a problem to specify which one it is. However
RMS says it's a problem, so obviously it's a problem.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok |
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | All extremists should
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | be shot.
