on Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 01:19:20PM -0400, John Cowan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Matthew C. Weigel scripsit:
>
> > My opinion is that "MIT License with specified jurisdiction" should be
> > approved, as this seems like a valid concern.
>
> It should be noted for the record that such licenses are not GPL-compatible.
Why? Because of the "no additional conditions" requirement?
--
Karsten M. Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal
http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org
Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
PGP signature
