on 24/9/01 3:26 pm, Rick Moen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> But, of course, you were being very speculative, and rather jumping the
> gun:  My assumption that the OSI Board shares my notion that the right
> to privacy should be a part of the definition of open source may be
> entirely untrue.  Russ for one sounded skeptical at best.

I de-jump and apologize for sowing confusion: I share that skepticism but am
clearly not best placed to express it.

- Rob.

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

Reply via email to