on 24/9/01 3:26 pm, Rick Moen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > But, of course, you were being very speculative, and rather jumping the > gun: My assumption that the OSI Board shares my notion that the right > to privacy should be a part of the definition of open source may be > entirely untrue. Russ for one sounded skeptical at best. I de-jump and apologize for sowing confusion: I share that skepticism but am clearly not best placed to express it. - Rob. -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Rick Moen
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Rob Myers
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) John Cowan
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Rob Myers
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) John Cowan
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Rob Myers
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Rob Myers
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Rick Moen
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Rick Moen
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Rob Myers
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) phil hunt
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Chris Gray
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Russell Nelson
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Greg London
- GPL v. NDA (was Re: YAPL is bad) Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Steve Lhomme
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Rick Moen

