On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > This leads to a GPL-related issue which is not clear to me: can > redistribution of GPL code be constrained by an employment agreement? Well, that brings up the question of whether sharing within a corporation qualfies as "distribution," a question which I can't recall being answered (although it could just be my memory failing). -- Matthew Weigel Research Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ne [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Rob Myers
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Rob Myers
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Rick Moen
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Rick Moen
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Rob Myers
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) phil hunt
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Chris Gray
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Russell Nelson
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Greg London
- GPL v. NDA (was Re: YAPL is bad) Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Steve Lhomme
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Rick Moen
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Russell Nelson
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Russell Nelson
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Steve Lhomme

