phil hunt writes: > What if, as part of the porcess of approving a new licence, the > proposer of the license had to write a rationale of why a new license > is necessary, and why no existing OSI-certified licence exists > that does the job. Already do. http://opensource.org/docs/certification_mark.html#approval -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | It's a crime, not an act 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | of war. For my take, see: Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | http://quaker.org/crime.html -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) John Cowan
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Rob Myers
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Rob Myers
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Rick Moen
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Rick Moen
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Rob Myers
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) phil hunt
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Chris Gray
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Russell Nelson
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Greg London
- GPL v. NDA (was Re: YAPL is bad) Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Steve Lhomme
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Rick Moen
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Russell Nelson
- Re: YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?) Russell Nelson

