On Fri, 2002-01-18 at 16:16, DeBug wrote: > D> This will probablly work if we > D> ALLOW THEM TO CHOOSE WHO WILL GET the money they pay > If you still don't understand consider the following scheme > Free Software Foundation collects a customer-membership payments and > (dont spend and forget) register it in the database. The money > can be later (the next day or several years after) paid to > one of the free software development groups when that paticular > customer decides to buy that paticular product. If he has not enough > money in his customer-membership payments account he can pay some > extra payments. These scheme allows developers to compete on > customer-membership payments. > > Note: when government says copyrights help to promote usefull arts it > should answer how much ? The total yearly amount of money for these > purposes should be defined and the artists should compete on this > amount and not on the infinite one. It could be defined as Xpercents of > total nation incomes taxing each individual accordinglly ( Xpercents > of his incomes). > further-developing the idea we come to this: > > HealthCare Military/Police Education UseFull Arts > \ \ / / > \ \ | / > U%% \ V%% \ | Y%% / X%% > \ | | / > \ | | / > ALLOW THEM TO CHOOSE WHO WILL GET > > > This is where i think IT specialists should help > -- > Best regards, > DeBug mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > I follow you now, I got caught up in the tax word there for a while. This idea looks very interesting and could perhaps be developed further. I will print this out and give more thought. Oh I really like lateral thinkers.
Regards David
msg04428/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
