Karsten M. Self scripsit: > http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?mss:7011:200201:aeaodelkpbnhblgbdfno > > The answer is 1, its position is 2, its 2000 revenues are exeeded by > 107% by the top-ranked firm. Pure-play software is largely *not* a > viable strategy. At median, it's an US$30m/yr company strategy (mixed > model median is $56m/yr).
Microsoft, in other words. I don't have figures, but Microsfot does sell services: http://www.microsoft.com/business/services/mcs.asp Also they sell mice, which must surely be an insignificant part of their revenue, but why would they do it if it didn't make money for them? -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact, at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door. --sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
