On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Lawrence Rosen <lro...@rosenlaw.com> wrote: > Luis Villa writes: >> The following Open Source licenses are popular, widely used, or >> have strong communities: > > As long as that list remains, I will object. It is inaccurate, incomplete, > misleading, subject to cronyism and personal bias by members of the OSI > board of directors, and does not reflect the actual importance or uses of > those licenses.
Putting aside the specific basis for your objections for now, why are you objecting now and not in the past five years this list has been in use? Is there a particular change in the context that you think the new draft language introduces, or...? Luis _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss