Lawrence Rosen scripsit: > Many modern software standards, including the W3C HTML5 recommendation, > are almost indistinguishable from code.
I think HTML5 and EcmaScript 3 are pretty unusual in this respect, actually. > That is why the OWFa/CLA agreements include an open source compatible > copyright license -- just in case there is some copyrighted content in > the specification that needs to be recast, transformed, or adapted. No > reason to wait until some court analyzes John Cowan's contention in > your jurisdiction; everyone should feel free to copy, create derivative > works of, or distribute the specification because of the OWF license > agreements. A good plan. -- John Cowan <co...@ccil.org> http://www.ccil.org/~cowan "Make a case, man; you're full of naked assertions, just like Nietzsche." "Oh, i suffer from that, too. But you know, naked assertions or GTFO." --heard on #scheme, sorta _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
