Rick Moen scripsit: > Clark C. Evans brought that up in February. Rather than recap the > entire thing, I'll just repost my reply to him on that point.
You should add this to the KB; I did check there, but with no success. > http://linuxgazette.net/159/misc/lg/sugarcrm_and_badgeware_licensing_again.html Offline, alas. > (What's the difference between 'specified reasonable legal notices or > author attributions in that material' and required, immutable runtime > display of trademarked logos and advertising on every user interface > screen of the program and all derivatives? Degree, I suspect. If > reality is messy and lacks sharp distinctions sometimes, so be it.) My only point is that lawsuits to determine if some particular behavior is or is not reasonable are hard to win. -- Eric Raymond is the Margaret Mead John Cowan of the Open Source movement. [email protected] --Bruce Perens, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan some years ago _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
