Leo Simons wrote: > > You may add Your own copyright statement to such modifications and > > may provide (sublicense) additional or different license terms and > > conditions for use, reproduction, distribution or further > > modification of Your modifications, or for the Derivative Work as > > a whole, provided that the sublicense complies with the conditions > > stated in this License. > > an example of this would also be nice. I believe this says I may copy > the apache license, change its name, add a few clauses about limiting > distribution outside the US (for example), assume liability, call it the > "Bla-Bla, Inc. Open Source License", and distribute ASF-created code > under that license. Is that correct?
I believe this says that you may add a copyright notice and additional license terms to the modified files, for example "This changed file copyright Leo Simons and licensed under the GPL". That does not mean you have the right to modify the Apache license itself. That's not necessary for this purpose. You can include your own license document and refer to the Apache license in there. > is in the way? How can I provide additional or different license terms > if I'm not allowed to change the license document? "In addition to the terms found in the Apache license 2.0, the following terms are provided: A, B and C". Please note that my employer is not to be regarded as a "Contributor" as defined in the "Apache Community Contribution License". Arnoud -- Arnoud Engelfriet, Dutch patent attorney - Speaking only for myself Patents, copyright and IPR explained for techies: http://www.iusmentis.com/
