license  

Messages by Thread

• Licence URIs Dave Hodder
  • Re: Licence URIs Joshua Slive
• Apache license, httpclient, and applets Bruce McHaffie
  • Re: Apache license, httpclient, and applets robert burrell donkin
• Importing SourceForge code that uses ASL Scott Eade
  • Re: Importing SourceForge code that uses ASL Jennifer Machovec
• Question on The Apache License 2.0 Thomas DeWeese
  • Re: Question on The Apache License 2.0 Arnoud Engelfriet
• [Fwd]: License Committee report Mahesh T. Pai
• Re: [fm #36060] (news-admins) [fmII/contact] Ant 1.6.1 released Antoine Lévy-Lambert
• Apache License 2.0 Antoine Lévy-Lambert
  • Re: Apache License 2.0 Mahesh T. Pai
  • RE: Apache License 2.0 Noel J. Bergman
• New license and copyright dates Martin Cooper
  • Re: New license and copyright dates Brian Behlendorf
  • Re: New license and copyright dates Mahesh T. Pai
  • Re: New license and copyright dates Brian Behlendorf
• Cum And Look Like A P0RN STAR!!!!!!!! mesosphereemigrants Apmail-httpd-cvs-archive
• How to use the 2.0 license? Vincent Massol
  • Re: How to use the 2.0 license? Brian Behlendorf
• Apache License, Version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: Apache License, Version 2.0 Don Armstrong
  • Re: Apache License, Version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: Apache License, Version 2.0 Don Armstrong
  • Re: Apache License, Version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: Apache License, Version 2.0 Don Armstrong
• Don't Want To Be Busted ? ? ? . . . . . . . . rationales Qmailr
• Re: Ejacu.late Like A P0RN Star! Root
• Implied grant? Noel J. Bergman
  • Re: Implied grant? Brian Behlendorf
• Don't Want To Be Busted ? ? ? . . . . . . . . plums Lista
• Don't get busted ! ! . . . . . . . . . steaming Apmail-apr-cvs-archive
• Don't get busted ! ! . . . . . . . . . specially Apmail-perl-dev-archive
• Re: Herba.l Products of the year, 2003 Apmail-apr-dev-archive
• Fwd: Ejacu.late Like A P0RN Star Apmail-apr-dev-archive
  • Fwd: Ejacu.late Like A P0RN Star Apmail-httpd-cvs-archive
• Hi how are you? Ans
• G'day mate, hows things? Apmail-httpd-bugs-archive
  • G'day mate, hows things? Dxhdf5-users
• Cum and look like a po.rn star. Ve
• Hey mate, hows it going?? Announce-archive
• RE: Perfect gift for 2004 Lista
  • RE: Perfect gift for 2004 Brennan
• FW: Product of the year, 2003 vp_1okqcqwyex
• Proposed Apache License 2.0: When can we expect the second draft? Nathanael Nerode
  • Re: Proposed Apache License 2.0: When can we expect the second draft? Dave Hodder
  • Re: Proposed Apache License 2.0: When can we expect the second draft? Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: Proposed Apache License 2.0: When can we expect the second draft? Dave Hodder
  • Re: Proposed Apache License 2.0: When can we expect the second draft? Roy T. Fielding
• Corporate CLA is now official? Cliff Schmidt
  • Re: Corporate CLA is now official? Brian Behlendorf
  • Re: Corporate CLA is now official? Roy T. Fielding
• Extending termination clause to copyright license Joe Schaefer
• proposed license - frequently asked questions Leo Simons
• AL2: "Redistribution with Modification" Dave Hodder
• The new license makes my head hurt Iowa Hansen
• Re: [[email protected]: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0] Glenn Maynard
  • Re: [[email protected]: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0] Brian T. Sniffen
  • Re: [[email protected]: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0] Glenn Maynard
  • Re: [[email protected]: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0] Arnoud Engelfriet
  • Re: [[email protected]: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0] Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: [[email protected]: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0] Branden Robinson
  • Re: [[email protected]: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0] Branden Robinson
  • Re: [[email protected]: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0] Branden Robinson
  • Re: [[email protected]: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0] Branden Robinson
• A few comments on the proposed TCK license Dalibor Topic
  • Re: A few comments on the proposed TCK license Brian Behlendorf
  • Re: A few comments on the proposed TCK license Dalibor Topic
  • Re: A few comments on the proposed TCK license Brian Behlendorf
• FSF Comments on ASL 2.0 draft Eben Moglen
• Re: New Apache License MJ Ray
• "fully paid-up" Mahesh T. Pai
• (non) warranty Mahesh T. Pai
• termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Peterson, Scott K (HP Legal)
  • Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Joe Schaefer
  • Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Jennifer Machovec
  • RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Noel J. Bergman
  • Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Jennifer Machovec
  • RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Noel J. Bergman
  • Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Jennifer Machovec
  • RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Noel J. Bergman
  • Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Jennifer Machovec
  • RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Noel J. Bergman
  • RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Russell Nelson
  • RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Brian Behlendorf
  • RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Lawrence E. Rosen
  • Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Bruce Perens
  • Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Roy T. Fielding
  • RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Brian Behlendorf
  • RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Eben Moglen
  • Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Arnoud Engelfriet
  • Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Bruce Perens
  • Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Arnoud Engelfriet
  • Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Bruce Perens
  • Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Arnoud Engelfriet
  • RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Lawrence E. Rosen
  • RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Eben Moglen
  • RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Lawrence E. Rosen
• Electronic submission Noel J. Bergman
• Proposed Apache License License... Nathanael Nerode
  • Re: Proposed Apache License License... Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: Proposed Apache License License... Nicola Ken Barozzi
  • Re: Proposed Apache License License... Jennifer Machovec
• Proposed Apache license & patent/reciprocity issues Nathanael Nerode
• Proposed Apache License -- NOTICE section Nathanael Nerode
  • Re: Proposed Apache License -- NOTICE section Nathanael Nerode
• DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Brian M. Carlson
  • Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Henning Makholm
  • Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Don Armstrong
  • Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Glenn Maynard
  • Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Don Armstrong
  • Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Glenn Maynard
  • Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Don Armstrong
  • Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Don Armstrong
  • Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Anthony DeRobertis
  • Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Joe Schaefer
  • Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Anthony DeRobertis
  • Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Joe Schaefer
  • Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Joe Schaefer
  • Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses MJ Ray
  • Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Anthony DeRobertis
  • Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Branden Robinson
  • Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Nathanael Nerode
  • Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Roy T. Fielding
• Proposed Apache v.2.0 License and CLAs Jennifer Machovec
  • Software patent clause in proposed Apache v.2.0 License Arnoud Engelfriet
  • RE: Software patent clause in proposed Apache v.2.0 License Noel J. Bergman
  • Re: Software patent clause in proposed Apache v.2.0 License Joe Schaefer
  • Re: Software patent clause in proposed Apache v.2.0 License Arnoud Engelfriet
  • Re: Software patent clause in proposed Apache v.2.0 License Arnoud Engelfriet
  • Re: Software patent clause in proposed Apache v.2.0 License Jennifer Machovec
  • Re: Proposed Apache v.2.0 License and CLAs - reciprocity clause Mahesh T. Pai
  • Re: Proposed Apache v.2.0 License and CLAs - reciprocity clause Jennifer Machovec
  • Proposed Apache v.2.0 License and CLAs Jennifer Machovec
  • Re: Proposed Apache v.2.0 License and CLAs Mahesh T. Pai
  • Re: Proposed Apache v.2.0 License and CLAs Jennifer Machovec
• Mutual defence patent clause Paul Johnson
  • Re: Mutual defence patent clause n. alex rupp
  • Re: Mutual defence patent clause Arnoud Engelfriet
  • Re: Mutual defence patent clause Brian Behlendorf
  • Re: Mutual defence patent clause Brian Behlendorf
  • Re: Mutual defence patent clause Paul Johnson
  • Re: Mutual defence patent clause Brian Behlendorf
  • Re: Mutual defence patent clause Paul Johnson
• Definition of Contributor Jason Wies
  • Re: Definition of Contributor Stephen McConnell
  • Re: Definition of Contributor Arnoud Engelfriet
• Simple clarification (IMHO) Max . Hyre
• Copyright Grant n. alex rupp
• proposed license - some questions Leo Simons
  • Re: proposed license - some questions Arnoud Engelfriet
• Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Brian Goetz
  • Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Brian Goetz
  • Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Jason Wies
  • Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Brian Behlendorf
  • Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Don Armstrong
  • Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Brian Behlendorf
  • Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Don Armstrong
  • RE: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Noel J. Bergman
  • Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Dave Hodder
  • Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 David Crossley
  • Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 David Crossley
  • Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
• comments on 2.0 license proposal Eric Friedman
  • Re: comments on 2.0 license proposal Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: comments on 2.0 license proposal Charles Eckel