license  

Messages by Date

• 2004/05/29 Re: Licence URIs Joshua Slive
• 2004/05/23 Licence URIs Dave Hodder
• 2004/04/13 Re: Importing SourceForge code that uses ASL Jennifer Machovec
• 2004/04/13 Re: Apache license, httpclient, and applets robert burrell donkin
• 2004/04/13 Apache license, httpclient, and applets Bruce McHaffie
• 2004/04/02 Importing SourceForge code that uses ASL Scott Eade
• 2004/02/19 Re: Question on The Apache License 2.0 Arnoud Engelfriet
• 2004/02/19 Question on The Apache License 2.0 Thomas DeWeese
• 2004/02/17 [Fwd]: License Committee report Mahesh T. Pai
• 2004/02/17 RE: Apache License 2.0 Noel J. Bergman
• 2004/02/17 Re: Apache License 2.0 Mahesh T. Pai
• 2004/02/16 Re: [fm #36060] (news-admins) [fmII/contact] Ant 1.6.1 released Antoine Lévy-Lambert
• 2004/02/16 Apache License 2.0 Antoine Lévy-Lambert
• 2004/02/03 Re: New license and copyright dates Brian Behlendorf
• 2004/02/03 Re: New license and copyright dates Mahesh T. Pai
• 2004/02/02 Re: New license and copyright dates Brian Behlendorf
• 2004/02/02 New license and copyright dates Martin Cooper
• 2004/01/30 Cum And Look Like A P0RN STAR!!!!!!!! mesosphereemigrants Apmail-httpd-cvs-archive
• 2004/01/25 Re: How to use the 2.0 license? Brian Behlendorf
• 2004/01/25 How to use the 2.0 license? Vincent Massol
• 2004/01/23 Re: Apache License, Version 2.0 Don Armstrong
• 2004/01/23 Re: Apache License, Version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
• 2004/01/23 Re: Apache License, Version 2.0 Don Armstrong
• 2004/01/23 Re: Apache License, Version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
• 2004/01/23 Re: Apache License, Version 2.0 Don Armstrong
• 2004/01/23 Apache License, Version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
• 2004/01/23 Re: Implied grant? Brian Behlendorf
• 2004/01/23 Don't Want To Be Busted ? ? ? . . . . . . . . rationales Qmailr
• 2004/01/23 Re: Ejacu.late Like A P0RN Star! Root
• 2004/01/22 Implied grant? Noel J. Bergman
• 2004/01/22 Don't Want To Be Busted ? ? ? . . . . . . . . plums Lista
• 2004/01/21 Don't get busted ! ! . . . . . . . . . steaming Apmail-apr-cvs-archive
• 2004/01/20 Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 David Crossley
• 2004/01/20 Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
• 2004/01/20 Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
• 2004/01/20 Don't get busted ! ! . . . . . . . . . specially Apmail-perl-dev-archive
• 2004/01/16 G'day mate, hows things? Dxhdf5-users
• 2004/01/15 Re: Herba.l Products of the year, 2003 Apmail-apr-dev-archive
• 2004/01/15 Fwd: Ejacu.late Like A P0RN Star Apmail-httpd-cvs-archive
• 2004/01/15 Fwd: Ejacu.late Like A P0RN Star Apmail-apr-dev-archive
• 2004/01/14 Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 David Crossley
• 2004/01/14 Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Dave Hodder
• 2004/01/14 Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
• 2004/01/14 Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
• 2004/01/13 RE: Perfect gift for 2004 Brennan
• 2004/01/12 Hi how are you? Ans
• 2004/01/10 G'day mate, hows things? Apmail-httpd-bugs-archive
• 2004/01/09 RE: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Noel J. Bergman
• 2004/01/09 Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Don Armstrong
• 2004/01/09 Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Brian Behlendorf
• 2004/01/09 Cum and look like a po.rn star. Ve
• 2004/01/09 Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Don Armstrong
• 2004/01/07 Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Brian Behlendorf
• 2004/01/07 Hey mate, hows it going?? Announce-archive
• 2004/01/06 RE: Perfect gift for 2004 Lista
• 2004/01/01 FW: Product of the year, 2003 vp_1okqcqwyex
• 2004/01/01 Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Jason Wies
• 2003/12/24 Re: Proposed Apache License 2.0: When can we expect the second draft? Dave Hodder
• 2003/12/24 Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
• 2003/12/24 Re: Proposed Apache License 2.0: When can we expect the second draft? Roy T. Fielding
• 2003/12/24 Re: Proposed Apache License 2.0: When can we expect the second draft? Roy T. Fielding
• 2003/12/24 Re: Proposed Apache License 2.0: When can we expect the second draft? Dave Hodder
• 2003/12/23 Proposed Apache License 2.0: When can we expect the second draft? Nathanael Nerode
• 2003/12/03 Re: Corporate CLA is now official? Roy T. Fielding
• 2003/12/03 Re: Corporate CLA is now official? Brian Behlendorf
• 2003/12/03 Corporate CLA is now official? Cliff Schmidt
• 2003/11/22 RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Eben Moglen
• 2003/11/22 RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2003/11/22 RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2003/11/22 Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Arnoud Engelfriet
• 2003/11/22 Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Arnoud Engelfriet
• 2003/11/22 Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Bruce Perens
• 2003/11/22 Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Bruce Perens
• 2003/11/22 Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Roy T. Fielding
• 2003/11/22 Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Arnoud Engelfriet
• 2003/11/22 RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Eben Moglen
• 2003/11/21 RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Brian Behlendorf
• 2003/11/21 RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Brian Behlendorf
• 2003/11/21 Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Roy T. Fielding
• 2003/11/21 Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Bruce Perens
• 2003/11/21 Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Roy T. Fielding
• 2003/11/21 RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2003/11/21 RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Russell Nelson
• 2003/11/20 Extending termination clause to copyright license Joe Schaefer
• 2003/11/20 proposed license - frequently asked questions Leo Simons
• 2003/11/19 Re: [[email protected]: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0] Branden Robinson
• 2003/11/19 Re: [[email protected]: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0] Branden Robinson
• 2003/11/19 Re: [[email protected]: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0] Branden Robinson
• 2003/11/19 Re: [[email protected]: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0] Branden Robinson
• 2003/11/19 AL2: "Redistribution with Modification" Dave Hodder
• 2003/11/18 The new license makes my head hurt Iowa Hansen
• 2003/11/17 Re: [[email protected]: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0] Roy T. Fielding
• 2003/11/17 Re: [[email protected]: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0] Brian T. Sniffen
• 2003/11/17 Re: A few comments on the proposed TCK license Brian Behlendorf
• 2003/11/17 Re: [[email protected]: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0] Arnoud Engelfriet
• 2003/11/17 Re: [[email protected]: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0] Glenn Maynard
• 2003/11/17 Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Joe Schaefer
• 2003/11/17 Re: [[email protected]: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0] Glenn Maynard
• 2003/11/17 Re: A few comments on the proposed TCK license Dalibor Topic
• 2003/11/17 Re: A few comments on the proposed TCK license Brian Behlendorf
• 2003/11/16 A few comments on the proposed TCK license Dalibor Topic
• 2003/11/16 Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Joe Schaefer
• 2003/11/16 Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Anthony DeRobertis
• 2003/11/15 Re: Mutual defence patent clause Paul Johnson
• 2003/11/15 RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Noel J. Bergman
• 2003/11/15 Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Jennifer Machovec
• 2003/11/15 Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Branden Robinson
• 2003/11/14 RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Noel J. Bergman
• 2003/11/14 Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Jennifer Machovec
• 2003/11/14 RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Noel J. Bergman
• 2003/11/14 FSF Comments on ASL 2.0 draft Eben Moglen
• 2003/11/14 Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Jennifer Machovec
• 2003/11/14 RE: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Noel J. Bergman
• 2003/11/14 Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Joe Schaefer
• 2003/11/14 Re: Mutual defence patent clause Brian Behlendorf
• 2003/11/14 Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Roy T. Fielding
• 2003/11/14 Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Anthony DeRobertis
• 2003/11/14 Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Anthony DeRobertis
• 2003/11/14 Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses MJ Ray
• 2003/11/14 Re: New Apache License MJ Ray
• 2003/11/14 Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Jennifer Machovec
• 2003/11/14 Re: Proposed Apache v.2.0 License and CLAs - reciprocity clause Jennifer Machovec
• 2003/11/14 Re: Proposed Apache v.2.0 License and CLAs Jennifer Machovec
• 2003/11/14 Re: termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Joe Schaefer
• 2003/11/14 "fully paid-up" Mahesh T. Pai
• 2003/11/14 Re: Proposed Apache v.2.0 License and CLAs Mahesh T. Pai
• 2003/11/14 Re: Proposed Apache v.2.0 License and CLAs - reciprocity clause Mahesh T. Pai
• 2003/11/14 (non) warranty Mahesh T. Pai
• 2003/11/14 Re: Proposed Apache License License... Jennifer Machovec
• 2003/11/14 Re: Proposed Apache License License... Nicola Ken Barozzi
• 2003/11/14 termination with unrelated trigger considered harmful Peterson, Scott K (HP Legal)
• 2003/11/14 Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Don Armstrong
• 2003/11/13 Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Roy T. Fielding
• 2003/11/13 Electronic submission Noel J. Bergman
• 2003/11/13 Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Don Armstrong
• 2003/11/13 Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Glenn Maynard
• 2003/11/13 Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Don Armstrong
• 2003/11/13 Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Glenn Maynard
• 2003/11/13 Re: Proposed Apache License License... Roy T. Fielding
• 2003/11/13 Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Don Armstrong
• 2003/11/13 Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Roy T. Fielding
• 2003/11/13 Proposed Apache License License... Nathanael Nerode
• 2003/11/13 Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Nathanael Nerode
• 2003/11/13 Re: Proposed Apache License -- NOTICE section Nathanael Nerode
• 2003/11/13 Proposed Apache license & patent/reciprocity issues Nathanael Nerode
• 2003/11/13 Proposed Apache License -- NOTICE section Nathanael Nerode
• 2003/11/13 Re: Mutual defence patent clause Paul Johnson
• 2003/11/13 Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Henning Makholm
• 2003/11/13 Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Roy T. Fielding
• 2003/11/13 Re: Software patent clause in proposed Apache v.2.0 License Jennifer Machovec
• 2003/11/13 Re: DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Roy T. Fielding
• 2003/11/13 Re: Software patent clause in proposed Apache v.2.0 License Arnoud Engelfriet
• 2003/11/13 Re: Software patent clause in proposed Apache v.2.0 License Arnoud Engelfriet
• 2003/11/13 Re: Software patent clause in proposed Apache v.2.0 License Joe Schaefer
• 2003/11/13 RE: Software patent clause in proposed Apache v.2.0 License Noel J. Bergman
• 2003/11/13 Proposed Apache v.2.0 License and CLAs Jennifer Machovec
• 2003/11/13 Software patent clause in proposed Apache v.2.0 License Arnoud Engelfriet
• 2003/11/12 DFSG-freeness of Apache Software Licenses Brian M. Carlson
• 2003/11/12 Proposed Apache v.2.0 License and CLAs Jennifer Machovec
• 2003/11/12 Re: comments on 2.0 license proposal Charles Eckel
• 2003/11/12 Re: Mutual defence patent clause Brian Behlendorf
• 2003/11/12 Re: Mutual defence patent clause Brian Behlendorf
• 2003/11/12 Re: Mutual defence patent clause Arnoud Engelfriet
• 2003/11/12 Re: Mutual defence patent clause n. alex rupp
• 2003/11/12 Mutual defence patent clause Paul Johnson
• 2003/11/11 Re: Definition of Contributor Arnoud Engelfriet
• 2003/11/10 Re: Definition of Contributor Stephen McConnell
• 2003/11/10 Definition of Contributor Jason Wies
• 2003/11/10 Simple clarification (IMHO) Max . Hyre
• 2003/11/09 Copyright Grant n. alex rupp
• 2003/11/09 Re: proposed license - some questions Arnoud Engelfriet
• 2003/11/09 proposed license - some questions Leo Simons
• 2003/11/08 Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Brian Goetz
• 2003/11/08 Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
• 2003/11/08 Re: comments on 2.0 license proposal Roy T. Fielding
• 2003/11/07 Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
• 2003/11/07 Re: Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Brian Goetz
• 2003/11/07 Review of proposed Apache License, version 2.0 Roy T. Fielding
• 2003/11/07 comments on 2.0 license proposal Eric Friedman