I suspect you inadvertantly posted this to the right place. :) "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" was set up to discuss the Apache 2.0 license and the other proposed docs associated with it. "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" was the more free-form list for discussion Apache licensing issues in general (including donation forms, etc). Anyways, the document at
http://apache.org/licenses/cla-corporate.txt is older than the one we used with BEA, and I'm not sure it's been used with any company. The document at http://apache.org/licenses/proposed/cla-corporate.txt is the newer one used with BEA, and slightly modified to make it consistant with the language in the Apache 2.0 license. Though it should also work for us today, if there are other companies looking for a similar sort of document. Brian On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Cliff Schmidt wrote: > Sorry if I missed this, but did the Corporate CLA already move > beyond draft to final? I had seen it [0] linked from the proposed > licenses page [1] (note the big disclaimer at the top), but now > there appears to be a final version [2] (without the disclaimer) > linked from the main licenses page [3]. > > Cliff > > [0] http://apache.org/licenses/proposed/cla-corporate.txt > [1] http://apache.org/licenses/proposed/ > [2] http://apache.org/licenses/cla-corporate.txt > [3] http://apache.org/licenses/ >
