This list was created for public comments on the proposed 2.0 license.
Now that it has been approved by the board (more details forthcoming), we
should probably shut this list down and move general discussion about
Apache licensing policies to the more generic "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
I'll forward your note there and respond.
Brian
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> How do we interpret a project, e.g., such as AAA4Avalon on SourceForge,
> which uses the Apache License, but for which we do not have a CLA or
> Software Grant? There is some confusion, with some people considering the
> use of the Apache Software License to be an implied grant, and others being
> more conservative.
>
> --- Noel
>
