Yup, as Chas said: git clone git://github.com/tjweir/liftbook.git You'll need Lyx: http://www.lyx.org/
Derek and I are working on it pretty heavily right now, so expect it to change a lot. The work is under "Attribution-No Derivatives" ( http://creativecommons.org/license/results-one?license_code=by-nd ) If you have feedback, please email Derek and I. The addresses from the commit list are the ones to use. Cheers, Tyler On Nov 18, 8:20 am, Marius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks man ! > > On Nov 18, 10:28 am, "Charles F. Munat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It's on github, I think: > > > git clone git://github.com/tjweir/liftbook.git > > > Chas. > > > Marius wrote: > > > Tyler is there a way for me to sneaky see what you guys done so > > > far? :) > > > > Br's, > > > Marius > > > > On Nov 18, 2:50 am, TylerWeir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Derek and I expect the first draft of ours in January 2009. > > > >> On Nov 17, 7:01 pm, "Oscar Picasso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>> Two book? Wow! > > >>> Any idea when they are expected? > > >>> Oscar > > >>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:51 PM, David Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:33 AM, tacobandit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>>> I noticed mvn pulled a new lift today and it seems it's still not > > >>>>> working with scala 2.7.2? I'm not worried about it or anything just > > >>>>> wondering if I'm doing something wrong since I think David Pollack > > >>>>> remarked that once 2.7.2 final was released lift would be immediately > > >>>>> updated... > > >>>> I didn't same "immediately", I said soon after. Upgrading any > > >>>> software is > > >>>> a non-trivial task. > > >>>> There is a 2.7.2 branch of Lift. It's been maintained in parallel with > > >>>> Scala's 2.7.2 development. > > >>>> Lift depends on more than just Scala... it also depends on Specs and > > >>>> ScalaCheck. These packages were upgraded to Scala 2.7.2-final over the > > >>>> weekend. Expect Lift to be updated to 2.7.2-final this week. > > >>>>> Also, I'm wondering if there's a master plan for documentation. I > > >>>>> think that's a huge blocker for wide lift adoption. I mean not just > > >>>>> the lack of hand-holding tutorial type stuff but even in the > > >>>>> scaladocs... If they're anything like me, people pretty much have to > > >>>>> look at the source code to learn how to use lift... fortunately the > > >>>>> source is clear and easy to read so it's not so bad, and i'm happy > > >>>>> with it... but I just have a curiosity if addressing the > > >>>>> documentation issue is on the horizon? > > >>>> There are two Lift books in the works. As part of the API clean-up > > >>>> tasks, > > >>>> we're writing more ScalaDocs. It's a long process, but expect > > >>>> reasonable > > >>>> documentation when Lift goes 1.0. > > >>>> Thanks, > > >>>> David > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net > > >>>> Collaborative Task Managementhttp://much4.us > > >>>> Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp > > >>>> Git some:http://github.com/dpp --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
