I thought I had sent out an email on the list earlier asking what people would want to see in such an archetype. As a base, probably a master POM with a module for the persistence unit and a module for the Lift side of things. The persistence unit could have a skeleton persistence.xml in the right place but otherwise be empty. The Lift side could have the basic Boot and perhaps a Model class set up with a placeholder persistence setup. Thoughts?
Derek On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Timothy Perrett <[email protected]>wrote: > > Glad im not the only one ;-) > > On Apr 1, 11:15 pm, Viktor Klang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Timmy, > > > > yeah, I can see that coming in handy. > > > > Cheers, > > Viktor > > > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Tim Perrett <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Guys, > > > > > Do people see room for a blank JPA archetype just like we have blank > > > and basic of normal lift archetypes? > > > > > IMO, whilst its great having the basic one for learning and examples, > > > having something thats a workable starting point without having to > > > remove code etc would be helpful. > > > > > I appreciate this is a bit lazy - but i don't think it would take much > > > work and would provide a neat solution > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > Tim > > > > -- > > Viktor Klang > > Senior Systems Analyst > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
