Have you looked at Windmill?

http://www.getwindmill.com/

 From what I've heard it's pretty cool.

Chas.

David Pollak wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Bill Venners <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     Hi David,
> 
>     On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 9:28 PM, David Pollak
>     <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>      >
>      >
>      > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Bill Venners <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>      >>
>      >> Hi David,
>      >>
>      >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:11 AM, David Pollak
>      >> <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>      >> > Folks,
>      >> >
>      >> > Improved testing framework and better testing support when
>     running in
>      >> > "test"
>      >> > mode.
>      >> >
>      >> Can you elaborate on what your plans are for this?
>      >
>      > It's a goal, not a set of plans.  I'm expecting one of the
>     committers would
>      > take ownership and figure it out.  Wanna be a committer, take
>     ownership, and
>      > figure it out?
>      >
>     Ooh, I stepped in that one. 
> 
> 
> Yeah... don't you know the rule... get a good idea and you own it.  I'm 
> just the Tom Sawyer who's convincing the smart folks to white-wash my 
> fence/build Lift. ;-)
>  
> 
>     The testing Lift apps is a good, real use
>     case for both ScalaTest and Specs. I hope to meet with Eric Torreborre
>     Monday. I'll talk with him about what's needed for Lift, as I think
>     he's more familiar with its testing needs. I have definitely wanted to
>     do some work with Lift so I can become more familiar with it as a web
>     app framework, but just haven't had time yet. I'm gradually popping
>     things off my stack of tasks, so I'll get there eventually.
> 
> 
> Cool.  I think there's a need for a better way to test web apps in 
> general and to describe the state models so that they can be tested in a 
> sane way.  I just don't have a clue as to how to do it.  But... I think 
> it ties in with the JavaScript enhancements I want to see in 1.1. 
>  Perhaps there's some sort of state/logic combinator thingy that can 
> emit client-side JS, sync data, and be very testable.  Dunno... just 
> ranting/flailing.
>  
> 
> 
> 
>     Bill
> 
>      >>
>      >> Thanks.
>      >>
>      >> Bill
>      >>
>      >>
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      > --
>      > Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
>      > Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
>      > Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
>      > Git some: http://github.com/dpp
>      >
>      > >
>      >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
> Git some: http://github.com/dpp
> 
> > 

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to