I prefer QuickTime. Thanks, Bradford
On Apr 24, 12:21 pm, "marius d." <[email protected]> wrote: > Very very nice ... and that is something that would probably keep > audience with the mouth open for a few minutes. However it's just like > showing the dog a bone :) ... people would inherently wonder so maybe > a bit of more explanations on the wiring between the "global" chat > actor and the Comet actor would be helpful. I know it's trivial stuff > but still I think it worth it. > > On a slightly different topic ... ListenerManager model ... I wonder > if we can do it simpler then call updateMessages and then have lift > call the createUpdate. For really simple case perhaps a publishMessage > (a_message) would be easier and would avoid keeping the private state > in the actor.I know it's pretty much classical pattern in the way it > is right now ... but maybe ... just maybe we can simplify it a bit > more. > > Br's, > Marius > > On Apr 24, 6:50 pm, David Pollak <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Folks, > > > I did a draft of a screencast for a real-time chat app. It's > > athttp://tunaforcats.com/LiftScreenCast.avi > > > I'd like to get some critical feedback on it so I can improve it. > > > Thanks, > > > David > > > PS -- What's the best output format? AVI, QuickTime, Flash? > > > -- > > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net > > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp > > Git some:http://github.com/dpp --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
