George, To tell lift what doctype you want to use see my blog post here: http://is.gd/uJ4L
Also, you'll want to read another one of my posts in which I discuss the bind(...) method and how you can stop putting markup into your snippets: http://is.gd/sfyT Cheers, Tim On Apr 26, 1:02 pm, george <[email protected]> wrote: > hello all, > > hopefully someone can help me out here. > > i am trying to port some simple ajax stuff over to lift from a rails > app. basically it just loads an html fragment and puts it into the dom > using prototype. > > i have set up a template which contains the fragment at src/main/ > webapp/fragment.html > > <ul><li>item</li></ul> > > then i made the page available using the SiteMap and all seems good, > but here comes the problem > > the lift response adds the xml declaration and doctype, one of which > seems to cause prototype some problems > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";> > <ul><li>item</li></ul> > > so the question is, how can i make lift send back the raw html without > meddling with it? > > i have tried out using ResourceServer to serve it statically which > works, but this wouldn't allow me to generate the fragment > dynamically. > > i would also prefer to have a separate html template file rather than > embedding the markup code in a snippet. > > any thoughts gratefully received.. > > george --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
