Timothy,

thanks for the links, I found them useful and I find your blog in
general very interesting. Came across scala-blogs.org and it looks
quite promising as well.

I knew "bind" already from the "Exploring Lift" book which I pull from
git, build with Lyx and keep at hand regularly. In the doctype post,
though, I couldn't find a way to specify "no doctype"  which I think
is necessary to serve a fragment; plus I couldn't find any other easy
"out-of-the-box" way to do it. Shouldn't this use case (serving
fragments), which I think is quite common, be better / more easily
supported by the framework? Can someone post an example of how to do
it with raw response handling in the meanwhile?

Thanks anybody.

Fabio

On 26 Apr, 21:49, Timothy Perrett <[email protected]> wrote:
> George,
>
> To tell lift what doctype you want to use see my blog post 
> here:http://is.gd/uJ4L
>
> Also, you'll want to read another one of my posts in which I discuss
> the bind(...) method and how you can stop putting markup into your
> snippets:http://is.gd/sfyT
>
> Cheers, Tim
>
> On Apr 26, 1:02 pm, george <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > hello all,
>
> > hopefully someone can help me out here.
>
> > i am trying to port some simple ajax stuff over to lift from a rails
> > app. basically it just loads anhtmlfragmentand puts it into the dom
> > using prototype.
>
> > i have set up a template which contains thefragmentat src/main/
> > webapp/fragment.html
>
> > <ul><li>item</li></ul>
>
> > then i made the page available using the SiteMap and all seems good,
> > but here comes the problem
>
> > the lift response adds the xml declaration and doctype, one of which
> > seems to cause prototype some problems
>
> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> > <!DOCTYPEhtmlPUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" 
> > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
> > <ul><li>item</li></ul>
>
> > so the question is, how can i make lift send back the rawhtmlwithout
> > meddling with it?
>
> > i have tried out using ResourceServer to serve it statically which
> > works, but this wouldn't allow me to generate thefragment
> > dynamically.
>
> > i would also prefer to have a separatehtmltemplate file rather than
> > embedding the markup code in a snippet.
>
> > any thoughts gratefully received..
>
> > george

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to