On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:46 AM, marius d. <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> This is a decision that needs consensus ... and David's agreement.


I'm cool with it.

It might also be worth thinking about creating some "alias" library so folks
could change the default names of Lift's snippets.  Or maybe that's just a
bad idea.


>
> Personally I agree with it but others may not.
>
> Br's,
> Marius
>
> On Aug 19, 12:41 pm, inca <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Why not just introduce the new tag, leaving the former alone (possibly
> > deprecated in next major releases)?
> >
> > On 19 авг, 12:07, "marius d." <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes we tried to deprecate it but later on we un-derprecate it :)
> >
> > > So you can use <lift:with-param> safely. Purely for naming perspective
> > > <lift:insert> seems to me more intuitive than <lift:with-param> ...
> > > I'm not sure if this is a strong enough motivation to change the name
> > > hence inducing a breaking change.
> >
> > > Br's,
> > > Marius
> >
> > > On Aug 19, 10:55 am, inca <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > As suggested inhttp://
> groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/d664b712d...
> > > > by Mr. Marius D., I should use lift:with-param in order to insert
> > > > content into multiple bind points of template. But recently I read
> > > > that this tag is deprecated. What alternatives are available?
> > > > P.S. I would propose <lift:insert at="bindPointName"> tag for this
> > > > purpose. And the contents of <lift:bind name="bindPointName"> tag
> > > > should be assumed as default if none <lift:insert ...> tag overrides
> > > > it.
> >
>


-- 
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Git some: http://github.com/dpp

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to