I will add <lift:insert> support .. personally I don't feel very comfortable allowing builtin snippets to have different names. One case I'm thinking of that people may change them, post issues on the list and we'd have o idea what the user really uses which may lead to longer discussions and support. I've learned my lesson with over- customization of things; it can bring real pains sometimes.
Just my 2 cents ... Br's, Marius On Aug 20, 4:09 pm, inca <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, David, that's wonderful idea, too. Should eliminate many > headaches. > > On 20 авг, 01:59, David Pollak <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:46 AM, marius d. <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > This is a decision that needs consensus ... and David's agreement. > > > I'm cool with it. > > > It might also be worth thinking about creating some "alias" library so folks > > could change the default names of Lift's snippets. Or maybe that's just a > > bad idea. > > > > Personally I agree with it but others may not. > > > > Br's, > > > Marius > > > > On Aug 19, 12:41 pm, inca <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Why not just introduce the new tag, leaving the former alone (possibly > > > > deprecated in next major releases)? > > > > > On 19 авг, 12:07, "marius d." <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Yes we tried to deprecate it but later on we un-derprecate it :) > > > > > > So you can use <lift:with-param> safely. Purely for naming perspective > > > > > <lift:insert> seems to me more intuitive than <lift:with-param> ... > > > > > I'm not sure if this is a strong enough motivation to change the name > > > > > hence inducing a breaking change. > > > > > > Br's, > > > > > Marius > > > > > > On Aug 19, 10:55 am, inca <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > As suggested inhttp:// > > > groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/d664b712d... > > > > > > by Mr. Marius D., I should use lift:with-param in order to insert > > > > > > content into multiple bind points of template. But recently I read > > > > > > that this tag is deprecated. What alternatives are available? > > > > > > P.S. I would propose <lift:insert at="bindPointName"> tag for this > > > > > > purpose. And the contents of <lift:bind name="bindPointName"> tag > > > > > > should be assumed as default if none <lift:insert ...> tag overrides > > > > > > it. > > > -- > > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net > > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp > > Git some:http://github.com/dpp --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
