Can you elaborate on what you mean? I was actually going to look at how log4jdbc does it and see if I could replicate it.
Derek On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:22 AM, Viktor Klang <viktor.kl...@gmail.com>wrote: > Is it possible to have a bridge trait for the Statement interface? > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Derek Chen-Becker <dchenbec...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> No. I hadn't foreseen this issue, but I understand the importance of have >> Java 5 support. I'm fine with writing and maintaining multiple versions of >> the impls for the various versions, but I wonder if there's any clean way to >> manage this with Maven. >> >> Derek >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:00 PM, David Pollak < >> feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Crud. This just isn't going to be easy, is it? >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Derek Chen-Becker < >>> dchenbec...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Another issue, which may be more problematic, is that in my case I'm >>>> compiling against the java.sql.Statement interface. If I remove the >>>> troublesome methods so that it compiles for 1.5, it no longer compiles for >>>> 1.6 because of the missing methods: >>>> >>>> [WARNING] >>>> /home/software/liftweb/lift-mapper/src/main/scala/net/liftweb/mapper/LoggingStatementWrappers.scala:70: >>>> error: class LoggedStatement needs to be abstract, since method isPoolable >>>> in trait Statement of type ()Boolean is not defined >>>> [WARNING] class LoggedStatement(underlying : Statement) extends >>>> Statement with DBLog { >>>> [WARNING] ^ >>>> [WARNING] >>>> /home/software/liftweb/lift-mapper/src/main/scala/net/liftweb/mapper/LoggingStatementWrappers.scala:267: >>>> error: class LoggedPreparedStatement needs to be abstract, since method >>>> setNClob in trait PreparedStatement of type (Int,java.io.Reader)Unit is not >>>> defined >>>> [WARNING] class LoggedPreparedStatement (stmt : String, underlying : >>>> PreparedStatement) extends LoggedStatement(underlying) with >>>> PreparedStatement { >>>> [WARNING] ^ >>>> >>>> >>>> Derek >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 2:29 PM, David Pollak < >>>> feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Derek Chen-Becker < >>>>> dchenbec...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The issue (and I may be overthinking this) is that we need 1.5 class >>>>>> libraries to compile against if we want to be able to verify that the >>>>>> code >>>>>> compiles under 1.5. If I, say, delete my JDK 5 install and decide to >>>>>> reinstall it down the road, it's not going to be available without a >>>>>> purchased license. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I can stash away a bunch of different copies of the JDK and give them >>>>> to you when you need them. >>>>> >>>>> A 32 bit Linux JDK 1.5 should be enough to at least do smoke test >>>>> builds with. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Derek >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:33 PM, David Pollak < >>>>>> feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Derek Chen-Becker < >>>>>>> dchenbec...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My main concern is that after October 30, Java 5 costs money (I'm >>>>>>>> guessing not a trivial amount, either). I can get the JDK right now, >>>>>>>> but if >>>>>>>> some bug in the Java libraries pops up that would prevent things from >>>>>>>> working, I don't know how we'll work around that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't see the condition under which that could happen. When we >>>>>>> compile against Java 1.5, we are simply defining the contract between >>>>>>> our >>>>>>> classes and the library classes. None of the library "seeps" into our >>>>>>> code >>>>>>> (this is not true of Scala traits). So, as long as the running library >>>>>>> has >>>>>>> the classes/methods that we are calling, we're fine. Compiling against >>>>>>> 1.5 >>>>>>> simply means that we have fewer calls that we can make. If there is an >>>>>>> issue in 1.5 that a user is experiencing, that is the user's issue, not >>>>>>> ours. If the code compiles (and runs tests) against 1.5 and does not >>>>>>> generate the particular issue that the user is seeing under 1.6, then >>>>>>> that >>>>>>> use has to contact Sun, not us. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Derek >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:29 PM, David Pollak < >>>>>>>> feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Derek Chen-Becker < >>>>>>>>> dchenbec...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I was just about to work on issue #67 (build breaks on Java 5), >>>>>>>>>> but when I went to get a Java 5 JDK to compile/test with, Sun says >>>>>>>>>> that it's >>>>>>>>>> EOL as of October 30, 2009. I don't have a problem fixing things to >>>>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>>>> with Java 5, but I don't want to do work that's going to be tossed >>>>>>>>>> out in a >>>>>>>>>> month. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Lift will be JDK 1.5 compatible for at least 1 year (and probably >>>>>>>>> longer). LinkedIn and SAP are both 1.5 shops. There are tons of >>>>>>>>> other Bay >>>>>>>>> Area companies (Wells Fargo, Kaiser, etc.) that are also 1.5 shops. >>>>>>>>> For the >>>>>>>>> next 2-3 years, OS X 10.5 will be common and 10.5 + old MacBooks == >>>>>>>>> 1.5. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It will not be lost work. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Derek >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net >>>>>>>>> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >>>>>>>>> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp >>>>>>>>> Surf the harmonics >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net >>>>>>> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >>>>>>> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp >>>>>>> Surf the harmonics >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net >>>>> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >>>>> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp >>>>> Surf the harmonics >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net >>> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >>> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp >>> Surf the harmonics >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > -- > Viktor Klang > > Blog: klangism.blogspot.com > Twttr: viktorklang > > Lift Committer - liftweb.com > AKKA Committer - akkasource.org > Cassidy - github.com/viktorklang/Cassidy.git > SoftPub founder: http://groups.google.com/group/softpub > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---