On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 3:40 AM, Alan M <[email protected]> wrote:
> My most recent posting was just my interpretation of what was said in > this thread and I was just asking for confirmation. I didn't go > looking for any more answers because I thought I had it. > I've only been monitoring my thread since.. I didn't catch that other > thread. > > OK, after reading that other thread I'm surprised I got as far as I > did. So it seems to me that Lift (the 280 port) was built with RC3 > and my stuff with RC5 and that caused some kind of incompatibility.. > (hence my odd LogBoot error) but if I recompiled everything (or tried) > with RC5 there'd still be trouble right now building Lift. OK so I > think I understand where things are now. > > Oh and just because I don't want to switch off of Netbeans or go back > a version is no reason to get all snarky about it. :p > With an attitude like this, do not expect me to answer your questions or help you out in the future. > Alan > > On Dec 23, 5:32 pm, David Pollak <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Alan M <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > So the 2.8 port branch(I'm used to subversion lingo) is broken right > > > now? > > > > No. Until Scala 2.8. RC6, the Scala compiler had problems compiling Lift > > code. We have been actively working with EPFL to make sure Lift and > Scala > > 2.8 together and EPFL has been very responsive. > > > > I am not usually an RTFM kinda guy, but in this case, you should spend > just > > a few minutes reviewing the Lift mailing list to understand what's going > > on? Why? How often do you see a conversation between me and Martin > > Odersky? When you see a conversation, which we were having just > yesterday > > about the 2.8/Lift issue, between us, you can bet that it worth reading. > > So, go back and read it. > > > > > Ouch, the only netbeans plugin for scala that works on the > > > current release of netbeans requires 2.8xx.. > > > > Please refer to my previous email. And just so you know, "gee, I want to > > use the latest and greatest NetBeans plugin even though there are plenty > of > > other Scala IDE environments," is not a compelling reason. > > > > David > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh and I'm not mixing lift versions in the same webapp, I was mixing > > > in the same container. But now I moved both webapps to the 2.8.0 > > > port. > > > > > I guess I should have just hung back on netbeans, hindsight 20/20 and > > > all, ugh.. > > > > > Alan > > > > > On Dec 22, 8:03 pm, Randinn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > This is not the first time this has cropped up, you may have to > sticky > > > > warning not to use 2.8 with Lift for the moment. > > > > > > On Dec 23, 2:55 pm, David Pollak <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Lift *DOES NOT* work on Scala 2.8 Beta1 RC4 & 5. Do not even try > it. > > > We > > > > > are currently working with EPFL to resolve these issues. > > > > > > > Lift 1.1-M8 and Lift 1.1-SNAPSHOT only work with Scala 2.7.7. That > is > > > the > > > > > *only* version of Scala that Lift 1.1-M8 and SNAPSHOT work with. > If > > > you > > > > > have any other version of Scala specified in your pom.xml file, it > will > > > not > > > > > work. > > > > > > > Do not try to mix different versions of Lift in the same web app. > The > > > class > > > > > loader will not know which versions of the Lift library go with > > > different > > > > > Servlets. > > > > > > > Once you get your pom.xml file set up with Scala 2.7.7, then you > must > > > do a > > > > > "mvn -U clean install" before doing an mvn jetty:run > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Alan M <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > Update: > > > > > > > > I updated the other servlet to scala 2.8 and lift 1.1 snapshot > (much > > > > > > easier than I thought, I must be getting used to it) and I > checked > > > the > > > > > > libs for both webapps and the commons lib directory.. no > conflicting > > > > > > versions of scala or lift jars.. I'm on Tomcat 6 btw.. Not sure > > > where > > > > > > to look next.. > > > > > > > > Alan > > > > > > > > On Dec 22, 7:13 pm, Ross Mellgren <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Where do you have the scala library jars? If you haven't taken > > > pains to > > > > > > ensure that you have two entirely separate scala JARs (2.7.3 and > 2.8) > > > in two > > > > > > separate classloaders I could believe that you'll get all kinds > of > > > problems > > > > > > like this. You might be better served using two separate tomcat > > > instances > > > > > > and some kind of reverse proxy like nginx to ensure they remain > > > entirely > > > > > > separated. > > > > > > > > > -Ross > > > > > > > > > On Dec 22, 2009, at 10:07 PM, Alan M wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I get this message when it tries to initialize the > LiftFilter.. > > > > > > > > > > Dec 22, 2009 6:53:40 PM > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext > > > > > > > > filterStart > > > > > > > > SEVERE: Exception starting filter LiftFilter > > > > > > > > java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: > > > scala.collection.SeqLike.projection() > > > > > > > > Ljava/lang/Object; > > > > > > > > at > > > net.liftweb.util.ListHelpers$class.first(ListHelpers.scala: > > > > > > > > 53) > > > > > > > > at net.liftweb.util.Helpers$.first(Helpers.scala:32) > > > > > > > > at > net.liftweb.util.LogBoot$.findTheFile$1(Log.scala:117) > > > > > > > > at > net.liftweb.util.LogBoot$._log4JSetup(Log.scala:119) > > > > > > > > at > net.liftweb.util.LogBoot$$anonfun$1.apply(Log.scala:97) > > > > > > > > at > net.liftweb.util.LogBoot$$anonfun$1.apply(Log.scala:97) > > > > > > > > at net.liftweb.util.LogBoot$.checkConfig(Log.scala:95) > > > > > > > > at > > > net.liftweb.util.LogBoot$.net$liftweb$util$LogBoot$$_logger > > > > > > > > (Log.scala:141) > > > > > > > > at > > > net.liftweb.util.LogBoot$$anonfun$2.apply(Log.scala:143) > > > > > > > > at > > > net.liftweb.util.LogBoot$$anonfun$2.apply(Log.scala:143) > > > > > > > > at net.liftweb.util.Log$.rootLogger(Log.scala:27) > > > > > > > > at net.liftweb.util.Log$.error(Log.scala:43) > > > > > > > > at > net.liftweb.http.provider.HTTPProvider$class.bootLift > > > > > > > > (HTTPProvider.scala:80) > > > > > > > > at > > > net.liftweb.http.LiftFilter.bootLift(LiftServlet.scala:524) > > > > > > > > at > net.liftweb.http.provider.servlet.ServletFilterProvider > > > > > > > > $class.init(ServletFilterProvider.scala:23) > > > > > > > > at > net.liftweb.http.LiftFilter.init(LiftServlet.scala:524) > > > > > > > > > > Are multiple versions of Scala or Lift getting messed up > here? I > > > have > > > > > > > > two different Lift based servlets on this tomcat, one with > Scala > > > 2.7.3 > > > > > > > > and an older lift version and one with Scala 2.8 and the > newest > > > lift > > > > > > > > version.. > > > > > > > > > > I guess I'm just trying to avoid updating that other servlet > > > because > > > > > > > > it's really not in my schedule right now.. Then again that > might > > > not > > > > > > > > be the problem at all.. > > > > > > > > > > Alan > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > > > Google > > > > > > Groups "Lift" group. > > > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > > [email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]> > <liftweb%[email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]> > > > > > <liftweb%[email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]> > <liftweb%[email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]> > >> > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > > > > > > groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google > > > Groups > > > > > > "Lift" group. > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > > [email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]> > <liftweb%[email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]> > > > > > <liftweb%[email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]> > <liftweb%[email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]> > >> > > > > > > . > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net > > > > > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > > > > > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp > > > > > Surf the harmonics > > > > > -- > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > "Lift" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]> > <liftweb%[email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]> > > > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > > > -- > > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net > > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp > > Surf the harmonics > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
