On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:31 PM, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've written a work-around and am currently testing the code.... more in a > few minutes. > If you can make it work, so much the better. To give some info: The original ticket had a vararg parameter of the form List[_]* in a case class. This caused type inference for the synthetic equals method (which uses sameElements for varargs) to fail, because the existential in List[_] made the problem underconstrained. The patch passed the argument type explicitly as the type parameter. In the lift case, it seems that this explicit type parameter violated some type bound, so the type inferencer should have chosen a more general type which would not violate the bound. The easiest fix is probably to just roll back and leave ticket #2867 open until we find a better solution. That's what I have done.
Cheers -- Martin
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
