Okay... the work-around is checked into the Lift repo.

I say, "Ship RC8 as the beta" and we'll work through this (and likely other)
issues during the beta period.

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:36 AM, martin odersky <martin.oder...@epfl.ch>wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:31 PM, David Pollak
> <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've written a work-around and am currently testing the code.... more in
> a
> > few minutes.
> >
> If you can make it work, so much the better. To give some info: The
> original ticket had a vararg parameter of the form List[_]* in a case
> class. This caused type inference for the synthetic equals method
> (which uses sameElements for varargs) to fail, because the existential
> in List[_] made the problem underconstrained. The patch passed the
> argument type explicitly as the type parameter. In the lift case, it
> seems that this explicit type parameter violated some type bound, so
> the type inferencer should have chosen a more general type which would
> not violate the bound. The easiest fix is probably to just roll back
> and leave ticket #2867 open until we find a better solution. That's
> what I have done.
>
> Cheers
>
>  -- Martin
>



-- 
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Surf the harmonics
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.

Reply via email to