Okay... the work-around is checked into the Lift repo. I say, "Ship RC8 as the beta" and we'll work through this (and likely other) issues during the beta period.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:36 AM, martin odersky <martin.oder...@epfl.ch>wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:31 PM, David Pollak > <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've written a work-around and am currently testing the code.... more in > a > > few minutes. > > > If you can make it work, so much the better. To give some info: The > original ticket had a vararg parameter of the form List[_]* in a case > class. This caused type inference for the synthetic equals method > (which uses sameElements for varargs) to fail, because the existential > in List[_] made the problem underconstrained. The patch passed the > argument type explicitly as the type parameter. In the lift case, it > seems that this explicit type parameter violated some type bound, so > the type inferencer should have chosen a more general type which would > not violate the bound. The easiest fix is probably to just roll back > and leave ticket #2867 open until we find a better solution. That's > what I have done. > > Cheers > > -- Martin > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Surf the harmonics--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.