Thanks Indrajit :) That was my thought also, running a top level mvn clean install on 280_port_refresh results in the stack trace below, yes.
Cheers, Tim On 31 Jan 2010, at 18:07, Indrajit Raychaudhuri wrote: > Welcome back, Tim! > > I am suspecting that an incorrect spec version is sneaking in. > Just to confirm - the maintained 2.8 port branch is 280_port_refresh. > > Cheers, Indrajit > > On 31/01/10 11:02 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote: >> I just attempted to build the branch and got the following: >> >> Running net.liftweb.common.BoxSpecTest >> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireExecutionException: org/specs/ >> matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon$4; nested exception is >> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/specs/matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon >> $4 >> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/specs/matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon >> $4 >> at org.specs.Specification.<init>(Specification.scala:43) >> at net.liftweb.common.BoxSpec$.<init>(BoxSpec.scala:26) >> at net.liftweb.common.BoxSpec$.<clinit>(BoxSpec.scala) >> at net.liftweb.common.BoxSpecTest.<init>(BoxSpec.scala:25) >> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0 >> (Native Method) >> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance >> (NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39) >> at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance >> (DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27) >> at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java: >> 513) >> at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:355) >> at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:308) >> at org.specs.runner.JUnitSuiteRunner.testSuite >> (JUnitSuiteRunner.scala:37) >> at org.specs.runner.JUnitSuiteRunner.run >> (JUnitSuiteRunner.scala:45) >> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute >> (JUnit4TestSet.java:59) >> at >> org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet >> (AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:115) >> at >> org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute >> (AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:102) >> at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:180) >> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) >> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke >> (NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) >> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke >> (DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) >> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) >> at >> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess >> (SurefireBooter.java:350) >> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main >> (SurefireBooter.java:1021) >> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: >> org.specs.matcher.AnyBaseMatchers$$anon$4 >> at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:197) >> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) >> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188) >> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:315) >> at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java: >> 330) >> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:250) >> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java: >> 398) >> ... 22 more >> Caused by: java.util.zip.ZipException: invalid bit length repeat >> at java.util.zip.InflaterInputStream.read >> (InflaterInputStream.java:147) >> at sun.misc.Resource.getBytes(Resource.java:108) >> at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java: >> 256) >> at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:56) >> at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:195) >> ... 28 more >> >> Obviously an issue with specs, but just thought id report it to >> hopefully add some clarity. >> >> Cheers, Tim >> >> On Jan 27, 8:15 pm, David Pollak<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Jeppe Nejsum >>> Madsen<[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Indrajit Raychaudhuri<[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>>> Some more awesomeness - 280_port_refresh of Lift has moved to >>>>> Scala-2.8.0.Beta1. >>> >>>>> Cheers, Indrajit >>> >>>> Awesome. How much is supported? >>> >>> Right now, nothing... I'm working on fixing some issues and working around >>> compiler problems. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Someone running anything substantial on >>>> 2.8 yet? I really (really!) want to ditch the 2.7 Eclipse plugin for >>>> 2.8.... >>> >>>> /Jeppe >>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>> "Lift" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> [email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]> >>>> . >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. >>> >>> -- >>> Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net >>> Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >>> Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp >>> Surf the harmonics >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
