The output is fine. Curious to know what puzzled you in the output.
Can you please send me the output of "mvn help:effective-pom" for
lift-common?
Cheers, Indrajit
On 31/01/10 11:47 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
However, the dependency tree looks like:
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Building Lift Common
[INFO] task-segment: [dependency:tree]
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] [dependency:tree {execution: default-cli}]
[INFO] net.liftweb:lift-common:jar:2.0-scala280-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] +- org.scala-lang:scala-library:jar:2.8.0.Beta1:compile
[INFO] +- org.scala-tools.testing:specs_2.8.0.Beta1:jar:1.6.2:test
[INFO] +-
org.scala-tools.testing:scalacheck_2.8.0.Beta1-RC5:jar:1.7-SNAPSHOT:test
[INFO] | \- org.scala-tools.testing:test-interface:jar:0.2:test
[INFO] \- junit:junit:jar:4.7:test
Which is somewhat puzzling...
Cheers, Tim
On 31 Jan 2010, at 18:07, Indrajit Raychaudhuri wrote:
Welcome back, Tim!
I am suspecting that an incorrect spec version is sneaking in.
Just to confirm - the maintained 2.8 port branch is 280_port_refresh.
Cheers, Indrajit
On 31/01/10 11:02 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
I just attempted to build the branch and got the following:
Running net.liftweb.common.BoxSpecTest
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireExecutionException: org/specs/
matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon$4; nested exception is
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/specs/matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon
$4
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/specs/matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon
$4
at org.specs.Specification.<init>(Specification.scala:43)
at net.liftweb.common.BoxSpec$.<init>(BoxSpec.scala:26)
at net.liftweb.common.BoxSpec$.<clinit>(BoxSpec.scala)
at net.liftweb.common.BoxSpecTest.<init>(BoxSpec.scala:25)
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0
(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance
(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance
(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27)
at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:
513)
at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:355)
at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:308)
at org.specs.runner.JUnitSuiteRunner.testSuite
(JUnitSuiteRunner.scala:37)
at org.specs.runner.JUnitSuiteRunner.run
(JUnitSuiteRunner.scala:45)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute
(JUnit4TestSet.java:59)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet
(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:115)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute
(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:102)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:180)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess
(SurefireBooter.java:350)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main
(SurefireBooter.java:1021)
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.specs.matcher.AnyBaseMatchers$$anon$4
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:197)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:315)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:
330)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:250)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:
398)
... 22 more
Caused by: java.util.zip.ZipException: invalid bit length repeat
at java.util.zip.InflaterInputStream.read
(InflaterInputStream.java:147)
at sun.misc.Resource.getBytes(Resource.java:108)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:
256)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:56)
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:195)
... 28 more
Obviously an issue with specs, but just thought id report it to
hopefully add some clarity.
Cheers, Tim
On Jan 27, 8:15 pm, David Pollak<feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen<je...@ingolfs.dk>wrote:
Indrajit Raychaudhuri<indraj...@gmail.com> writes:
Some more awesomeness - 280_port_refresh of Lift has moved to
Scala-2.8.0.Beta1.
Cheers, Indrajit
Awesome. How much is supported?
Right now, nothing... I'm working on fixing some issues and working around
compiler problems.
Someone running anything substantial on
2.8 yet? I really (really!) want to ditch the 2.7 Eclipse plugin for
2.8....
/Jeppe
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<liftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
--
Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
Surf the harmonics
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
