However, the dependency tree looks like:
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Building Lift Common
[INFO] task-segment: [dependency:tree]
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] [dependency:tree {execution: default-cli}]
[INFO] net.liftweb:lift-common:jar:2.0-scala280-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] +- org.scala-lang:scala-library:jar:2.8.0.Beta1:compile
[INFO] +- org.scala-tools.testing:specs_2.8.0.Beta1:jar:1.6.2:test
[INFO] +-
org.scala-tools.testing:scalacheck_2.8.0.Beta1-RC5:jar:1.7-SNAPSHOT:test
[INFO] | \- org.scala-tools.testing:test-interface:jar:0.2:test
[INFO] \- junit:junit:jar:4.7:test
Which is somewhat puzzling...
Cheers, Tim
On 31 Jan 2010, at 18:07, Indrajit Raychaudhuri wrote:
> Welcome back, Tim!
>
> I am suspecting that an incorrect spec version is sneaking in.
> Just to confirm - the maintained 2.8 port branch is 280_port_refresh.
>
> Cheers, Indrajit
>
> On 31/01/10 11:02 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
>> I just attempted to build the branch and got the following:
>>
>> Running net.liftweb.common.BoxSpecTest
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireExecutionException: org/specs/
>> matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon$4; nested exception is
>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/specs/matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon
>> $4
>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/specs/matcher/AnyBaseMatchers$$anon
>> $4
>> at org.specs.Specification.<init>(Specification.scala:43)
>> at net.liftweb.common.BoxSpec$.<init>(BoxSpec.scala:26)
>> at net.liftweb.common.BoxSpec$.<clinit>(BoxSpec.scala)
>> at net.liftweb.common.BoxSpecTest.<init>(BoxSpec.scala:25)
>> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0
>> (Native Method)
>> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance
>> (NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39)
>> at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance
>> (DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27)
>> at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:
>> 513)
>> at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:355)
>> at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:308)
>> at org.specs.runner.JUnitSuiteRunner.testSuite
>> (JUnitSuiteRunner.scala:37)
>> at org.specs.runner.JUnitSuiteRunner.run
>> (JUnitSuiteRunner.scala:45)
>> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute
>> (JUnit4TestSet.java:59)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet
>> (AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:115)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute
>> (AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:102)
>> at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:180)
>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
>> (NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
>> (DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>> at
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess
>> (SurefireBooter.java:350)
>> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main
>> (SurefireBooter.java:1021)
>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>> org.specs.matcher.AnyBaseMatchers$$anon$4
>> at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:197)
>> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188)
>> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:315)
>> at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:
>> 330)
>> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:250)
>> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:
>> 398)
>> ... 22 more
>> Caused by: java.util.zip.ZipException: invalid bit length repeat
>> at java.util.zip.InflaterInputStream.read
>> (InflaterInputStream.java:147)
>> at sun.misc.Resource.getBytes(Resource.java:108)
>> at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:
>> 256)
>> at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:56)
>> at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:195)
>> ... 28 more
>>
>> Obviously an issue with specs, but just thought id report it to
>> hopefully add some clarity.
>>
>> Cheers, Tim
>>
>> On Jan 27, 8:15 pm, David Pollak<[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Jeppe Nejsum
>>> Madsen<[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Indrajit Raychaudhuri<[email protected]> writes:
>>>
>>>>> Some more awesomeness - 280_port_refresh of Lift has moved to
>>>>> Scala-2.8.0.Beta1.
>>>
>>>>> Cheers, Indrajit
>>>
>>>> Awesome. How much is supported?
>>>
>>> Right now, nothing... I'm working on fixing some issues and working around
>>> compiler problems.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Someone running anything substantial on
>>>> 2.8 yet? I really (really!) want to ditch the 2.7 Eclipse plugin for
>>>> 2.8....
>>>
>>>> /Jeppe
>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>>> "Lift" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected]<liftweb%[email protected]>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
>>> Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
>>> Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
>>> Surf the harmonics
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Lift" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
