ZmnSCPxj <zmnsc...@protonmail.com> writes: > Ha, no, looking at the detailed `SIGHASH_NOINPUT` spec, `hashPrevouts`, which > normally commits to the other inputs, is blanked, so we do not commit to them > either. This means that `SIGHASH_NOINPUT` implicitly has a > `SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY`. > > (the BIP `SIGHASH_NOINPUT` in the eltoo pdf does not mention `hashSequence`, > but it seems you managed to add that to your github BIP repository)
Yeah, Russell O'Connor pointed that difference out and I saw no point in committing to the hashSequence, so I amended both the paper and the BIP. The paper will get updated in a few days with the typos people have found, but I thought that the BIP discussion was more urgent to keep up to date, so I pushed that directly :-) _______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
