Any reason not to include _all_ (up to a limit) incoming channels with sufficient capacity?
Cheers, Johan On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 4:12 AM Rusty Russell <ru...@blockstream.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm considering a change to c-lightning, where `invoice` would > automatically append an 'r' field for a channel which has sufficient > *incoming* capacity for the amount (using a weighted probability across > our peers). > > This isn't quite what 'r' was for, but it would be a useful > hint for payment routing and also potentially for establishing an > initial channel. This is an issue for the Blockstream Store which > deliberately doesn't advertize an address any more to avoid > centralization. > > Thoughts welcome! > Rusty. > _______________________________________________ > Lightning-dev mailing list > Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev >
_______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
