Any reason not to include _all_ (up to a limit) incoming channels with
sufficient capacity?


On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 4:12 AM Rusty Russell <> wrote:

> Hi all,
>         I'm considering a change to c-lightning, where `invoice` would
> automatically append an 'r' field for a channel which has sufficient
> *incoming* capacity for the amount (using a weighted probability across
> our peers).
>          This isn't quite what 'r' was for, but it would be a useful
> hint for payment routing and also potentially for establishing an
> initial channel.  This is an issue for the Blockstream Store which
> deliberately doesn't advertize an address any more to avoid
> centralization.
> Thoughts welcome!
> Rusty.
> _______________________________________________
> Lightning-dev mailing list
Lightning-dev mailing list

Reply via email to