Good morning,

> -   in set reconciliation schemes: we could reconcile [channel id |
>     timestamp | checksum] first

Perhaps I misunderstand how set reconciliation works, but --- if timestamp is 
changed while checksum is not, then it would still be seen as a set difference 
and still require further communication rounds to discover that the channel 
parameters have not actually changed.

Perhaps it is better to reconcile [channel_id | checksum] instead, and if there 
is a different set of channel parameters, share the set difference and sort out 
which timestamp is later at that point.

Lightning-dev mailing list

Reply via email to