On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 at 04:43, ZmnSCPxj <zmnsc...@protonmail.com> wrote:
> > -   in set reconciliation schemes: we could reconcile [channel id |
> >     timestamp | checksum] first
> Perhaps I misunderstand how set reconciliation works, but --- if timestamp is 
> changed while checksum is not, then it would still be seen as a set 
> difference and still require further communication rounds to discover that 
> the channel parameters have not actually changed.
> Perhaps it is better to reconcile [channel_id | checksum] instead, and if 
> there is a different set of channel parameters, share the set difference and 
> sort out which timestamp is later at that point.

Ah yes of course, the `timestamp` should not be included.

Lightning-dev mailing list

Reply via email to