On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 at 04:43, ZmnSCPxj <zmnsc...@protonmail.com> wrote: > > - in set reconciliation schemes: we could reconcile [channel id | > > timestamp | checksum] first > > Perhaps I misunderstand how set reconciliation works, but --- if timestamp is > changed while checksum is not, then it would still be seen as a set > difference and still require further communication rounds to discover that > the channel parameters have not actually changed. > > Perhaps it is better to reconcile [channel_id | checksum] instead, and if > there is a different set of channel parameters, share the set difference and > sort out which timestamp is later at that point.
Ah yes of course, the `timestamp` should not be included. Cheers, Fabrice _______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
