Comment #49 on issue 3330 by [email protected]: bracketify-stencil
moves grob's refpoint
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3330
ok, ok. I don't want bureaucracy, I'm just trying to get a grip on this
issue. With the limited time i have and increasing volume of the
discussion (that's not a complaint; it's good that the discussion is
detailed!) i'm loosing the understanding of what we want to achieve.
Let's approach this differently: maybe you could use that wiki to write
down *your own* specification, as it is progressing? (i.e. without having
to disuss it, and without any "acceptation process".) If not in wiki,
maybe you could include such specs in the patches themselves, as an
addition to CG/some other manual?
The point is: i'd really love to be able to go to one place and read a
description of what (not how) the stencil code is supposed to do, and why.
For example, "add-to-stencil and derived functions should be associative"
is an extremely helpful big-picture design information, and helps
tremendously when reviewing code.
Of course, i don't demand that you do this. But without such info gathered
in one place i'll probably be unable to participate int the discussion,
unfortunately :(
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
